Breast cancer metastasis to urinary bladder related hematuria and concomitant venous thromboembolism—case report of a challenging clinical scenario
Case Report

Breast cancer metastasis to urinary bladder related hematuria and concomitant venous thromboembolism—case report of a challenging clinical scenario

Chek Hao Foo1, Wai Loon Yam2, Chien Sheng Tan3, Joon Jae Park2

1Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore; 2Department of Urology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; 3Department of Pathology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

Correspondence to: Joon Jae Park. Department of Urology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. Email: park.joon.jae@singhealth.com.sg.

Abstract: Breast cancer metastasis to the urinary bladder is uncommon and its true incidence may be underreported, requiring a high level of clinical suspicion to diagnose them. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a known complication in breast cancer and guidelines recommend treatment with the use of anticoagulation therapy unless contraindicated by active bleed or high bleeding risk. We present a rare case of 42-year-old female patient presenting with concurrent VTE and visible hematuria due to breast cancer metastasis to the urinary bladder. The patient initially underwent radical mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection for high grade invasive ductal breast carcinoma (pT3N3cM0). Despite adjuvant radiotherapy, chemotherapy and hormonal therapy, the patient subsequently developed interval liver and bladder metastasis. She presented with right lower limb VTE 6 years after the initial mastectomy. The patient developed painless visible hematuria after starting anticoagulation therapy. Hence treatment of VTE was contraindicated and was managed instead with insertion of an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter. In the literature, breast cancer metastasis to the urinary bladder is rare, with 65 published to date. Our case report is unique as there was concomitant symptomatic VTE, thereby posing a clinical challenge of not being able to use anticoagulation therapy. We postulate that as the cancer specific and overall survival rates for breast cancer patients continues to improve, the incidence of patients presenting with metastasis to the urinary bladder may increase. Urinary bladder metastasis in breast cancer populations have variable presentations, requiring a high level of clinical suspicion. Prompt collaboration with urologists and pathologists is recommended in this group of patients who complaints of hematuria. Prognosis is usually poor and the optimal management is currently unknown.

Keywords: Breast cancer; urinary bladder; venous thromboembolism (VTE); inferior vena cava filter (IVC filter); case report


Received: 02 August 2020; Accepted: 16 October 2020; Published: 30 December 2020.

doi: 10.21037/abs-20-90


Introduction

Breast cancer metastasis to the urinary bladder is uncommon and is usually seen in more advanced stages of systemic dissemination. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a known complication associated with breast cancer. VTE treatment guidelines recommend anticoagulation therapy in most cases that is not contraindicated by an active bleed or high bleeding risk. We present a patient with metastatic invasive ductal breast carcinoma and secondary bladder metastasis who developed VTE while experiencing hematuria. We discuss the diagnostic tests and treatment performed, and the use of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters as an alternative for anticoagulation therapy in patients with hematuria from urinary bladder metastasis. The following case was presented in accordance with the CARE reporting checklist (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/abs-20-90).


Case presentation

We present a 42-year-old woman with stage IV breast cancer and previous metastasis to the lungs and bones who presented with visible hematuria with small clots. Six years prior in 2013, the patient was a 36-year-old nulligravida patient of Malay race with no significant past medical history of note. Back then she presented with a right palpable breast lump which was suspicious of malignancy on fine needle aspiration cytology. Subsequent core biopsy showed infiltrative poorly differentiated ductal carcinoma with desmoplastic stroma. A staging magnetic resonance imaging showed a right breast 4.2×3.8×2 cm3 speculated, lobulated and rim-enhancing mass that was separate to the overlying pectoralis muscle. A computed tomography (CT) of the chest and abdomen showed a poorly defined enhancing mass in the upper half of the right breast and no distant metastasis.

The patient subsequently underwent a right mastectomy with axillary lymph node clearance and implant reconstruction. Histological findings revealed high grade invasive ductal carcinoma (pT3N3cM0) that was human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2-positive), estrogen receptor negative (ER-negative) and progesterone receptor negative (PR-negative). Extensive lymphovascular invasion was noted along perinodal involvement, with 2 out of 24 removed lymph nodes tested positive for metastasis. High grade ductal carcinoma in situ that appeared solid, comedo and cribriform was incidentally observed as well.

Post-operatively, the patient received adjuvant AC-TH chemotherapy regimens (adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel and trastuzumab) with maintenance trastuzumab for 1 year after chemotherapy. She also received adjuvant external beam radiotherapy to her right chest and right supraclavicular fossa. Rising serum cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3) with increasing lung and bone involvement on CT was noted at a follow-up 1.5 years later in 2015. The patient was given additional radiotherapy to the right pelvis, and started on vinorelbine and trastuzumab regimens, which were later changed to capecitabine and trastuzumab as patient was unable to tolerate their side effects.

The patient underwent a right total hip arthroplasty secondary to right hip avascular necrosis and fracture in 2016. At this time, she had further progression with multiple liver metastases on CT scans. Between 2017 and 2018 the patient underwent multiple cycles of chemotherapy regimens (gemcitabine/trastuzumab, eribulin/trastuzumab and capecitabine/lapatinib). During this period, she continued to develop radiological progression with metastasis in the lungs, retroperitoneal lymph nodes and cervical lymph nodes.

In 2019 six years after the initial breast cancer diagnosis, the patient developed right lower limb deep vein thrombosis and was started on subcutaneous enoxaparin anticoagulation injections. This was suspended the day after in view of visible hematuria with clots. This was not associated with any dysuria or increased urinary frequency. A urologist consult was obtained and urological physical examination was unremarkable. Urine microscopy showed red blood cells but no leukocyte cells. Urine was sterile and urine cytology was negative for malignant cells. CT scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis showed no cause for her hematuria. Flexible cystoscopy showed an irregular sessile tumor covering the entire bladder trigone with contact bleeding (Figures 1,2). Blood clots were seen at the dependent part of the bladder. The rest of the bladder mucosa was normal (Figure 3). Biopsy of the bladder trigone tumor showed detached fragments of malignant glands with pleomorphic nuclei and prominent nucleoli. Tumor cells were diffusely immunoreactive to HER-2 stain (3+ staining pattern) on immunohistochemical studies, suggesting breast cancer origin.

Figure 1 Retroflex view on cystoscopy showing irregular sessile tumour covering entire bladder trigone.
Figure 2 Left trigone showing irregular sessile tumour. The left ureteric orifice could not be identified.
Figure 3 Right lateral bladder wall showing healthy right lateral wall bladder mucosa.

Enoxaparin therapy was discontinued in view of the patient’s active hematuria, and an IVC filter was deployed in the infra-renal portion of the IVC to minimize the risk of pulmonary embolism (Figures 4,5).

Figure 4 Fluoroscopic image of (A) inferior vena cava filter deployment in the infra-renal portion of the inferior vena cava, (B) iodinated intravenous contrast opacifying the left common iliac vein and inferior vena cava, and (C) tip of a 5 Fr Bern catheter that was inserted via the left common femoral vein.
Figure 5 Coronal view of a chest, abdomen and pelvis computerized tomography showing (A) inferior vena cava filter inserted in the inferior vena cava and (B) extensive liver metastasis.

She was subsequently seen by the medical oncologist and was planned to start trastuzumab emtansine (also known as T-DM1), but this was delayed due to right hip septic arthritis caused by methicillin sensitive staphylococcus aureus requiring intravenous antibiotics. A debridement and washout of the right hip was performed by the orthopedic surgeons under general anesthesia. The patient continued to deteriorate thereafter and demised 1 month after the diagnosis of the bladder metastasis (Figure 6).

Figure 6 Overview of clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment of the patient.

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for this publication.


Discussion

VTE in breast cancer

The association between VTE and breast cancer has been established in previous literature. In 2010, Cronin-Fenton reported a 3–4-fold increase in likelihood of VTE in breast cancer patients compared to the general population (1). In 2013, Walker described an absolute rate 2–3 times greater VTE incidence in breast cancer patients when compared to control (2). In addition, Walker reported a 10.8-fold higher VTE incidence in breast cancer patients while receiving chemotherapy, and higher VTE risk up to three months after (3). VTE has been linked to a high short-term mortality risk, which more than doubles in the time following an event (4). Khorana identified it as a leading contributor of non-cancer deaths in cancer patients (5).

Treatment options

Guidelines for the management of VTE in cancer patients involve initiating anticoagulant therapy. IVC filter insertion may be offered if absolute contraindication to anticoagulant therapy exists, or as an adjunct if there is recurrent or progression of VTE despite optimal pharmacological treatment. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) clinical practice guidelines 2019 recommends pharmacological agents such as low molecular weight heparin, unfractionated heparin, fondaparinux (a synthetic factor Xa inhibitor) or rivaroxaban (a direct oral anticoagulant) unless an active bleed, high bleeding risk or severe renal impairment is present (6). The American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) guidelines 2016 provided similar recommendations, but recommended against the concurrent use of IVC filters with anticoagulant therapy (7).

In literature, Wallace found that IVC filters were effective at preventing pulmonary embolism related deaths in patients where anticoagulation therapy was contraindicated (8). A similar case identified by Sweeney in 2018 described IVC filter insertion for primary bladder urothelial carcinoma and symptomatic hematuria that was complicated by VTE (9). In 2013, Stein et al. reported a case fatality rate relative risk reduction of 0.71 (0.63–0.81, 95% CI, P value <0.0001) between those with and without IVC filter among patients with concomitant breast cancer and VTE (10).

IVC filter placement is not without risks and the treating physician or surgeon should weight the clinical risk against the benefit on a case by case basis. Complications of IVC filters include recurrent thrombosis, major bleeding and filter-related events such as filter thrombosis, filter tilt or filter fracture. In a 2017 retrospective study by Wassef, the reported filter-related complication was 22.2% post IVC filter placement. The most common complications were filter thrombosis (12.5%) and filter tilt (9.5%). Other complications included erosion into IVC wall (3.4%) and IVC filter fracture with subsequent migration of filter pieces (0.6%). Majority of the complications (75.7%) were documented in the first 28 days after insertion (11). Similarly, IVC filter complications were reported in 20% of patients in a 2014 retrospective study by Duffett et al. (12).

Metastasis to urinary bladder

Secondary bladder tumors from breast cancers are rare. A recent systematic review by Uday et al published in 2020 noted only 65 cases reported in the literature (13). Other sources of secondary tumors in the urinary bladder include direct extension of pelvic cancer or metastasis from distant organs such as stomach, lungs or skin cancer. Together, they contribute less than 2% of all bladder cancers.

Clinical presentations vary from lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) such as macroscopic painless hematuria, increased urination frequency, stress and urge incontinence, nocturia, dysuria, difficulty passing urine, urethral obstruction and back pain (14). Asymptomatic presentations with incidental diagnosis on imaging have been recorded as well, seen in the case identified by Cormio in 2014 (15). Ramsey postulated that symptoms may be clinically apparent only in late metastasis after penetration into the bladder mucosal, and the number of clinical reports may be under-reporting its true incidence (16).

In view of this, we recommend a high degree of clinical suspicious for patients with known breast cancer presenting with either hematuria and/or LUTS. Early urological consult is recommended in such patients. Urinary bladder ultrasound is a safe diagnostic modality for breast cancer patients presenting with urinary symptoms, especially with impaired renal function. Should renal function allows, then a 3 phase CT urogram will be a useful imaging modality as is able to not only detect any filling defects along the urinary tract but also look for degree progression in other solid organs. However, as in our case report, small bladder lesions can still be missed on imaging alone. Flexible cystoscopy is advantageous to identify bladder lesions and perform biopsies for further histological evaluation (17). We recommend that at the time of submitting any biopsy from the bladder, the pathologist is made aware of the prior history of breast cancer as to guide them in their choice of immunohistochemistry. In the absence of suspicious lesions, random bladder biopsies may still identify bladder metastasis as described by Balachandran and Duckett in 2014 (18).

Urinary bladder metastasis from breast cancer carries a poor prognosis. Patient survival can range between 1 month to 2 years with a median survival of 6 months after bladder metastases diagnosis. However, cases of survival up to 5 years post diagnosis have been previously reported in literature, as reported by Poulakis et al. in 2001 (19).

Future incidence

Survival rates in patients with metastatic breast cancer have steadily improved over the last 30 years with the evolution of new treatment options. Five-year survival rates calculated from patients identified between 1985 to 2016 had improved from 10% to 27%, and median survival increased from 13 to 33 months (20).

We postulate that as the cancer specific and overall survival rates for breast cancer patients continues to improve, the incidence of patients presenting with metastasis to the urinary bladder may increase. The ideal systemic therapy in this rare group of patients is currently unknown and further research will be warranted in the future.

Strength and limitations

This case highlights the difficulties that clinicians might face as overall survival for breast cancer improves. The strength of this case report is that it highlights an effective management modality in patients with VTE who have contraindications to anticoagulation. In our case IVC filter was shown to be an effective alternative to anticoagulation to prevent pulmonary embolus from occurring. The limitations of this case report is that it relates to a single case experience and due to complications from septic arthritis, the patient was not able to undergo further palliative chemotherapy. Hence we are unable to comment on the response to palliative chemotherapy to this rare group of patients.


Conclusions

We report a case of urinary bladder metastasis from a primary breast cancer with concomitant VTE and hematuria. IVC filter placement is a viable option in patients with contraindications to anticoagulation. Breast surgeons and medical oncologists should have a high degree of suspicion for the possibility of metastasis to the urinary bladder. Prompt collaboration with urologist and pathologists is recommended. Prognosis is usually poor and the optimal management in this group of patient is currently unknown and require further research.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the CARE reporting checklist. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/abs-20-90

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/abs-20-90). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Cronin-Fenton DP, Sondergaard F, Pedersen L, et al. Hospitalisation for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients and the general population: a population-based cohort study in Denmark, 1997–2006. Br J Cancer 2010;103:947-53. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Walker AJ, Card TR, West J, et al. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer - a cohort study using linked United Kingdom databases. Eur J Cancer 2013;49:1404-13. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Walker AJ, West J, Card T, et al. When are breast cancer patients at highest risk of venous thromboembolism? A cohort study using English health care data. Blood 2016;127:849-57. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Khan UT, Walker AJ, Baig S, et al. Venous thromboembolism and mortality in breast cancer: cohort study with systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2017;17:747. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Khorana AA. Venous thromboembolism and prognosis in cancer. Thromb Res 2010;125:490-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Key N, Bohlke K, Falanga A. Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Treatment in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update Summary. J Oncol Prac 2019;15:661-4. [Crossref]
  7. Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J, et al. Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest 2016;149:315-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Wallace MJ, Jean JL, Gupta S, et al. Use of inferior vena caval filters and survival in patients with malignancy. Cancer 2004;101:1902-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Sweeney J, Parikh N. Inferior vena cava filter placement in a left IVC and drainage into duplicated SVC via hemiazygous continuation. Radiol Case Rep 2018;13:320-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Stein PD, Matta F, Sabra M. Case Fatality Rate with Vena Cava Filters in Hospitalized Stable Patients with Cancer and Pulmonary Embolism. Am J Med 2013;126:819-24. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Wassef A, Lim W, Wu C. Indications, complications and outcomes of inferior vena cava filters: A retrospective study. Thromb Res 2017;153:123-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Duffett LD, Gándara E, Cheung A, et al. Outcomes of patients requiring insertion of an inferior vena cava filter. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2014;25:266-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Karjol U, Jonnada P, Cherukuru S, et al. Bladder Metastasis from Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2020;12:e7408. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Sanguedolce F, Landriscina M, Ambrosi A, et al. Bladder Metastases from Breast Cancer: Managing the Unexpected. A Systematic Review. Urol Int 2018;101:125-31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Cormio L, Sanguedolce F, Di Fino G, et al. Asymptomatic Bladder Metastasis from Breast Cancer. Case Rep Urol 2014;2014:672591. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Ramsey J, Beckman EN, Winters JC. Breast cancer metastatic to the urinary bladder. Ochsner J 2008;8:208-12. [PubMed]
  17. Balachandran AA, Duckett J. Metastatic breast cancer presenting as detrusor overactivity. BMJ Case Rep 2014;2014:bcr2014207920. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Wong MH, Yiu MK, Ho KL. Metastatic carcinoma of breast in the urinary bladder. Hong Kong Med J 2013;19:455-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Poulakis V, Witzsch U, De Vries R, et al. Metastatic breast carcinoma to the bladder: 5-year followup. J Urol 2001;165:905. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Sundquist M, Brudin L, Tejler G. Improved survival in metastatic breast cancer 1985–2016. The Breast 2017;31:46-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
doi: 10.21037/abs-20-90
Cite this article as: Foo CH, Yam WL, Tan CS, Park JJ. Breast cancer metastasis to urinary bladder related hematuria and concomitant venous thromboembolism—case report of a challenging clinical scenario. Ann Breast Surg 2020;4:31.